1. Introduction

 “When I was playing the game we never had the benefit of TV or video to analyze our techniques or look at faults, we depended on other cricketers to watch us and then tell us what they thought we were doing wrong.” These words by a British athlete and cricket commentator, Sir Geoffrey Boycott, well highlight the importance of analyzing a technique in order to identify any possible faults or opportunities for further improvement. Of course, this would necessitate an adjustment of a current action in order to improve the given technique that can lead to greater success. Similarly, when it comes to Engineering Education, it is good to analyze what has been published over a period of time with regard to specific topics in order to identify any trends or opportunities for further research.

The surfacing of trends from data collections, such as user- generated content streams and news articles, is a popular and important data analysis activity, used in applications such as business intelligence, quantitative stock trading and social media exploration [1]. This has been extended to many different applications and fields of study, including Education. Identified trends in a specific field can be used to create awareness of what type of research has dominated a given topic over time and in formulating further recommendations with regard to that topic. For example, consider research on the trends relating to microcontroller education. A study noted the widespread dissemination of the Do-It-Yourself (DIY) culture and how modern-day microcontrollers have helped to fuel this culture [2]. Based on the trends identified in that study, a recommendation was made to use a multi-platform method using 8-bit microcontrollers and embedded C programming to maintain the effectiveness of microcontroller education. However, that study did not indicate how the number of publications relating to microcontroller education had increased over time, neither were the specific applications listed. This would help to identify further opportunities for the future application of microcontroller education.

Previous research has contrasted conference papers, journal articles and student dissertations to obtain bibliometric data [3-5]. However, the novelty of this study lies in its purpose, which is to contrast papers from three international IEEE conferences with regard to the application of microcontrollers in Engineering Education, so as to identify possible further applications. The use of citation analysis in this study is not for purposes of bibliometric analysis, but rather to determine which applications have attracted the most interest from fellow researchers around the globe. The article starts with a discussion on the rise of microcontrollers in Education. The context is then given along with the methodology. Results and conclusions follow at the end.

2. The rise of microcontrollers in Education

Microcontrollers were first considered at Intel in 1969 when a Japanese company approached Intel to build some integrated circuits for calculators [6]. Their history thus spans half a century, yet their impact has been extraordinary over the past two decades. They have indeed revolutionized electronic data acquisition systems [7], which is one of their primary applications.

Microcontrollers are used in many applications that require data acquisition, including industrial automation, control, measuring and consumer electronics [8]. They can be used in everything from relatively simple systems such as washing machines and vacuum cleaners, to much more advanced systems such as cars and robots [9]. In fact, they have become ubiquitous in our daily lives [10]. Its widespread adoption has necessitated changes to educational curricula, as institutions of higher learning move to make their programmes more relevant to the ever-changing technological landscape. These institutions seek to gain a competitive edge in the market of student recruitment, as they claim that their graduates will be better prepared to meet the demands of industry in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Indeed, this revolution has been called “disruptive”, as many changes have followed in its wake [11]. These changes led to the enhancement of new competence requirements (often termed “graduate attributes”) and foster adjustments and the updating of qualifications. It also leads to the emergence and extinction of qualifications.

These changes are also evident in many school programmes, as governments seek to strengthen Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education among its youth. For example, in South Africa, President Cyril Ramaphosa has indicated in 2019 that government will introduce Coding and Robotics in primary schools (first years of schooling termed Grades R to 3) with a plan to implement it fully by 2022. This is one of the steps taken by government to improve education in the country. Indeed, in many western countries, Robotics is becoming increasingly common in primary and secondary education, both as a specific discipline and a tool to make STEM subjects more appealing to children [12].

3. Context of this study

The context of this study is limited to conference papers presented at three IEEE conferences that focused on Engineering Education. These conferences are [13]:

• EDUCON: This Global Engineering Education Conference provides a forum for academic, research and industrial collaboration on global Engineering Education. It is the flagship conference of the IEEE Education Society for Europe, the Middle East and North Africa (IEEE Region 8).
• FIE: Frontiers in Education has become the premiere conference for innovative curricula, Engineering Education and research excellence. This conference is usually held in various locations around the United States (IEEE Regions 1-6) and, occasionally, in international venues.
• TALE: This International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education is the IEEE Education Society’s flagship in the Asia-Pacific region (IEEE Region 10). It caters for researchers and practitioners with an interest in engineering, technology, and integrated STEM education, as well as those interested in the innovative use of digital technologies for learning, teaching, and assessment in any discipline.

The reason for focusing only on these conferences is the fact that they are rated by Microsoft Academic [14] under the top ten Engineering Education conferences in the world, and they focus on all fields of Engineering. Many of the top ten conferences on the Microsoft Academic list are field specific, such as Instrumentation, Cybernetics, Data Mining, Computer Science and Collaborative Learning.

The topic of interest is limited to the use of two microcontrollers, namely the Arduino and Raspberry Pi. The main reason for this is due to the dominance of conference papers on these two microcontrollers at the three conferences. Figure 1 highlights the total number of conference papers per year that included the word “microcontroller” for these three conferences, as found on the IEEE Xplore website.

Figure 1: Conference papers using the word “microcontroller” from 2010 to 2019

More than 50% of these conference papers were related to the Arduino and Raspberry Pi. A secondary reason relates to the availability of communities of developers in which the participants share codes and experiences in projects relating to these platforms [14], which would make them easier to implement in Engineering Education.

It is noteworthy that EDUCON dominated the period of 2013 to 2016, while FIE dominated the last three years relating to the number of papers presented that mentioned the words “Arduino” and “Raspberry Pi”. This fluctuation can negate forecasting in terms of which conference will dominate microcontroller education over the coming years. However, this “perceived” competition does bode well for the growth of microcontroller Education, especially within other fields of study or in other applications.

4. Methodology used

Documentary analysis were used where the abstracts of papers from the three conferences were reviewed. Documentary analysis is an important source of information, because it is non-relative, meaning that the information found in documents will remain the same over time [15]. These abstracts are retrieved from the IEEE Xplore database by limiting the search to three IEEE-based conferences, and by then searching within the results. For example, EDUCON is inserted into the search bar available on the home page. Conferences are then applied on the next page. Search within results is then used to first search for the word “Arduino” and then for the words “Raspberry Pi”. The same procedure is then repeated for FIE and TALE. The search is limited to the time period of 2010 to 2019, as many conferences were impacted negatively in 2020 due to the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstracts are downloaded into a MS EXCEL sheet, where they are reviewed in terms of the field of application, number of authors, level of education and number of citations obtained since the publication. The citations can help to evaluate the impact of the publications [16], and also point to fields of application that are important to other researchers in Engineering Education. A large number of co-authors may indicate that more cross-disciplinary research is taking place. Within science, many studies have shown that papers with more co-authors tend to attract more citations [17].

5. Results

5.1. EDUCON results

Figure 2 contrasts the level of education where the microcontrollers have been applied. Arduino has dominated the discourse on the use of microcontrollers in Engineering Education as presented at EDUCON. A total of 15 papers were dedicated to it, with eight applied in Higher Education. It is encouraging to see that it has also been applied to STEM education at school level, where three papers were found in this regard. The Raspberry Pi has only been reported on in five papers relating to Higher Education. The generic column indicates that three papers reported on different levels of education where the Arduino has been implemented. Figure 3 indicates the various applications for the two microcontrollers that were presented since 2010 at EDUCON.

The main application relates to Robotics when considering the Arduino in Figure 3. This is not surprising, as Robotics research has increased at a rapid pace around the globe. More industries are searching for graduates with Robotics experience, and institutions of Higher Education are introducing new curriculums that include Robotics education. In fact, this is even being introduced at school level in South Africa, as mentioned earlier.

Electronics (A/D) feature second on the list of applications. Both basic analogue and digital electronics are covered in this number (three), indicating that the Arduino microcontroller has also been used to convey fundamental principles to Engineering students. Some principles may seem to be abstract to certain students. Seeing the “theory” in “practice”, or in action, does indeed help students to grasp and retain key principles. This may also be applied to the application of design (two papers dedicated to this), where students need to understand various concepts that need to be synthesized to obtain a working model.

Figure 2: Level of education noted for papers presented at EDUCON

Figure 3: Applications discerned in EDUCON papers from 2010 onwards

The application “Design” covers the creation of an electronic circuit to fulfill specific requirements. “Programming” involves learning a new computer language, such as C++, while “Remote labs” involve online work were students can access an online remote laboratory from their place of residence to complete practical experiments. “Control systems” or “Control” require students to control electrical or mechanical equipment by using a microcontroller, while “PBL” (problem-based learning) requires students to make use of microcontrollers to solve an engineering-related problem. The “Workshop” application indicates a short course in which academics or students are trained in the basic use of a microcontroller, while “Computing” calls on students to implement a microcontroller to perform mathematical or procedural tasks. The rest of the applications featured in only one paper each, with the dominant Raspberry Pi application being remote laboratories. This is expected, as the Raspberry Pi is a low-cost single-board computer that can function as a web server.

Figure 4 shows the number of authors for the 15 conference papers relating to Arduino as presented at EDUCON over the past ten years, along with their citation count. Figure 5 provides this same analysis for the Raspberry Pi.

Figure 4: Number of authors versus their citations for EDUCON papers relating to Arduino as determined on 1 November 2020

Figure 5: Number of authors versus their citations for EDUCON papers relating to the Raspberry Pi as determined on 1 November 2020

Two papers were presented in 2014 (see Figure 4), and four papers in 2019 (2 x 2014 and 4 x 2019). The maximum number of authors on a paper occurred in 2014, which was ten. That specific paper applied the Arduino microcontroller to the field of Robotics at school level. Two papers that have attracted the highest citation account were presented in 2016 (it focused on the design of electronic projects in Higher Education) and in 2018 (it focused on the use of Arduino in Robotics education at school level). Two papers were presented in 2015 (see Figure 5) and another two in 2018. The paper with the highest citation count was published in 2018 and related to the field of Robotics education in Higher Education.

5.2. FIE results

Figure 6 contrasts the level of education, where the two microcontrollers have been applied in Engineering Education papers that were presented at FIE. Again, the Arduino dominated the discourse over the past ten years at this international conference, with the majority of papers reporting on its implementation in Higher Education. A higher number of papers have been published at FIE, compared to EDUCON. However, the trend seems to be similar between the two conferences, with the Arduino again dominating in Higher Education. Figure 7 highlights the main applications for the two microcontrollers in Engineering Education.

Figure 6: Level of education noted for papers presented at FIE

Figure 7: Applications discerned in FIE papers from 2010 onwards

Again, the field of Robotics education tops the list. However, the Arduino microcontroller has also been well applied in the field of experimentation, where two papers are focused on improving Science and Technology education at school level through laboratory experiments. The Raspberry Pi finds equal representation in the fields of design and remote laboratories. “Experimentation” relates to the use of a microcontroller to complete a basic science experiment, while “Measurements” infer the measuring and recording of different parameters, such as temperature.

Figure 8 presents the number of authors for the papers along with their citation counts. An outstanding result is the citation of 2010. That particular conference paper reported on the use of an Arduino microcontroller to help students at home to complete science and technology experiments. This research would especially be applicable to 2020, where many students were forced to stay home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Figure 9 provides this same analysis for the Raspberry Pi.

Figure 8: Number of authors versus their citations for FIE papers relating to Arduino as determined on 1 November 2020

Figure 9: Number of authors versus their citations for FIE papers relating to the Raspberry Pi as determined on 1 November 2020

Four papers were presented in 2017 and another two in 2018 (see Figure 9). Two papers with the highest citation count were published in 2016 (related to the field of Robotics education in Higher Education) and in 2017 (related to remote laboratories).

Five papers were also found that reported on the use of both microcontrollers in the same course or module. All five papers reported on work done in Higher Education, where the fields of application included project-based learning, design, modelling and programming. A paper presented in 2015 has a current citation count of 29, and reported on the use of a range of microcontrollers that were being used in a number of courses relating to project-based learning. Another paper presented in 2016 has a current citation count of 26, and reported on the use of multiple microcontrollers in design-based learning.

5.3. TALE results

Figure 10 contrasts the level of education, where the two microcontrollers have been applied in Engineering Education papers that were presented at TALE. Figure 11 shows the main applications for the two microcontrollers in Engineering Education, which include Robotics education, Design and Control.

Figure 10:  Level of education noted for papers presented at TALE

Figure 11: Applications discerned in TALE papers from 2010 onwards

Again, the use of Arduino has been well reported on in Higher Education (see Figure 10), with only two papers dedicated to this at school level for both the Arduino and Raspberry Pi. Nine papers have reported on the use of the Arduino or the Raspberry Pi over the past eight years of the TALE conference that was first held in 2012.

Figure 12 presents the number of authors for the papers along with their citation counts. Two papers were presented in 2014 and three in 2018. One paper presented in 2014 has a current citation count of 9, and relates to project-based learning in Higher Education. Another paper presented in 2016 currently has an equal citation count, and relates to the use of Arduino in the field of Programming for freshmen Engineering students.

Only one paper relating to the use of the Raspberry Pi in the field of Programming at school level was found. Six authors contributed to this paper that was presented in 2019, and which has no citation count as yet. Table 1 contrasts the key results between the three international conferences.

Figure 12: Number of authors versus their citations for TALE papers relating to the Arduino as determined on 1 November 2020

FIE has a higher number of papers (19 + 7 = 26) than EDUCON or TALE. However, the ratio between papers related to the Arduino and to the Raspberry Pi is very similar, being 3:1 for EDUCON and 2.7:1 for FIE. TALE has a much higher ratio, being 8:1. All three conferences had papers with multiple authors, while the average citation count is the highest for EDUCON (4.8 and 5.4 respectively).

6. Possible difficulties in implementing microcontroller education at school/college/university level

Based on the results, it can be seen that more papers have reported on the use of microcontrollers in Higher Education as opposed to school level. This may be due to a number of difficulties or challenges that are experienced at school level.

Firstly, it has been reported that schools have limited funding and resources [18] that would impact on the purchase of different technologies. Partnering with an institution of Higher Education could overcome this challenge, as many universities are mandated to engage in community development where they should make use of their resources to empower and uplift their communities.

Secondly, limited online resources to help learners or students to further their engagement with specific types of technology were noted [19]. Opting for open source software that is freely available to the public, and especially when it comes to programming that is required with microcontrollers, can help institutions or schools to decide on which option they wish to take. Both the Arduino and Raspberry Pi feature open source software. However, the Arduino is aimed at quick programming and circuit prototyping, while the Raspberry Pi acts as a learning tool for computer programming. The Arduino consumes less power than a Raspberry Pi [20], and is a cheaper board that also supports PWM and analog signals [21].

Thirdly, teaching programming is a challenge since the failure and dropout rate can be high in introductory programming courses [22]. Both teachers and learners could struggle to learn a new programming language. However, this can also be mitigated when numerous online resources and programming examples are available from which to learn. Partnering with an institution of Higher Education can also help in this regard, as academics proficient in programming can then volunteer their time to engage with learners at their schools.

7. Opportunities for further application in Engineering Education

Based on the EDUCON results, it can be forecasted that this international conference may see more papers in the future dedicated to using the Arduino microcontroller in Robotics education at school level. A rise in conference papers relating to its application in design-based modules may also be evident in the future. As regards the Raspberry Pi, more remote laboratories can be set up to help students complete practical experiments from their own home. However, further applications can be recommend with regard to the Arduino that can be presented at future conferences.

One of the past papers at FIE reported on the use of Arduino in the field of Measurements [23], in terms of educating students about remote environmental monitoring (e.g. temperature and humidity). However, the field of Energy Monitoring is also growing rapidly, as more countries seek to invest in renewable energy. Institutions should seek to incorporate energy monitoring techniques into their curriculum so as to better prepare graduates for this specific industry. An example of such a technique can relate to the use of an innovative jig to stimulate awareness among Engineering students about the principle of operation of solar panels. An Arduino can be used as part of that jig to help students visualize the results of their experiments on a personal computer.

A second application relates to the remote control of electronic or mechanical equipment. The advent of the Fourth Industrial revolution has enabled the rollout of many different sensors that can now communicate with each other as part of the Internet of Things. One such application can focus on the remote control of garden plantation pumps using Arduino and mobile communications. Real-time monitoring of specific environmental conditions can help both academics and students to implement similar systems for other applications, such as an aquaponics system.

A third application relates to personal security. Globally, a drive exists to create awareness of gender-based violence and to empower communities to take a stand against domestic violence. Devices can be developed using microcontroller technology that can generate messages to a mobile number of a relative stipulating a victim’s location and relevant surrounding information. This type of application may help students to not only think of engineering-related problems, but to also become aware of social problems that could be mitigated by the use of microcontroller technology.

A fourth application relates to workshops for academic staff. A workshop was reported on in a conference paper presented at FIE in 2019. This workshop was presented to school learners in an effort to stimulate awareness of engineering design principles [24]. Similar workshops could be designed to help promote academic development among lecturers at colleges or teachers in schools. This can form part of lifelong learning and enable individuals to remain registered with international bodies as part of their continuous professional development. An example of such a workshop can relate to helping lecturers from a technical and vocational college to improve their technical and programming skills by using the Arduino platform.

8. Conclusions

The purpose of this article was to analyze the application of two main microcontrollers in Engineering Education by reviewing what has been published over the past ten years at three international IEEE conferences that focus primarily on Engineering Education. Results indicate that EDUCON dominated the field of microcontroller education from 2013 to 2016, while more papers were dedicated to this topic being presented at the FIE series of conferences from 2017 to 2019.

Over the past ten years, 26 conference papers were presented at FIE relating to the Arduino and Raspberry Pi. Twenty conference papers were presented at EDUCON, while nine papers were presented at TALE. The main application of these microcontrollers has been in the field of Robotics, with general electronics and design-based learning following suit. At least eleven papers focusing on the use of these microcontrollers at school level were found. Overall, the Arduino outranks the Raspberry Pi by almost 4:1, with the most cited papers relating to Robotics education, to helping students at home to complete science and technology experiments, and to programming.

Further applications can extend to energy monitoring and academic development workshops. The importance of energy monitoring has increased with a global drive to install more renewable energy systems in the world. Continuous professional development is also of key importance, as professionals seek to maintain their registration with official Engineering bodies around the world.

The future of using microcontrollers in Engineering Education is indeed bright, as more academics are seeking to promote student engagement by fusing theory and practice. Only time will tell to what heights academics will rise in their innovative use of these unique microcontrollers, as future analysis will reveal further trends and opportunities in this regard.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

1. N. Kamat, E. Wu, A. Nandi, “TrendQuery: a system for interactive exploration of trends,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Human-In-the-Loop Data Analytics, 1-4, 2016. doi.org/10.1145/2939502.2939514.
2. D. E. Bolanakis, A. K. Rachioti, E. Glavas, “Nowadays trends in microcontroller education: Do we educate engineers or electronic hobbyists? Recommendation on a multi-platform method and system for lab training activities,” in 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 73-77, 2017. doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942826.
3. A. J. Swart, “Citation Analysis of Master Dissertations at the Central University of Technology, South Africa,” AJLAIS, African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Sciences, 29(2), 115-129, 2019. DOI not available.
4. S. Van Herck, A. M. Fiscarelli, “Mind the Gap Gender and Computer Science Conferences,” in IFIP International Conference on Human Choice and Computers, 232-249, 2018.
5. P. Sebo, “General internal medicine and family medicine journals: Comparative study of published articles using bibliometric data,” Medicine, 99(24), 1-6, 2020. doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020586.
6. F. H. Siddig, “Designing and Implementing a Model for a Microcontroller Controlled Pick and Place,” Masters in Engineering, Sudan University of Science and Technology, 2014.
7. A. Busari Sherif, F. Dunmoye Abibat, F. Akingbade Kayode, “Development of Arduino-based Data Acquisition System for Environmental Monitoring using Zigbee Communication Protocol,” APTIKOM Journal on Computer Science and Information Technologies, 1(3), 109-118, 2016. doi.org/10.34306/csit.v1i3.56.
8. D. R. da S. Medeiros, M. F. Torquato, M. A. Fernandes, “Embedded genetic algorithm for low?power, low?cost, and low?size?memory devices,” Engineering Reports, 2(9), 12231, 2020. doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12231.
9. O. H. Graven, J. Bjørk, “The use of an Arduino pocket lab to increase motivation in Electrical engineering students for programming,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 239-243, 2016. doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2016.7851800.
10. W. Yu, O. Farook, J. P. Agrawal, A. Ahmed, “Board# 63: Teaching Microcontrollers with Emphasis on Control Applications in the Undergraduate Engineering Technology Program,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition2017. doi.org/10.18260/1-2–27895.
11. G. Spoettl, V. T?tlys, “Education and Training for the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 26(1), 1-6, 2020. doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v26i1.29848.
12. J. Vega, J. M. Cañas, “PyBoKids: an innovative python-based educational framework using real and simulated arduino robots,” Electronics, 8(8), 899, 2019. doi.org/10.3390/electronics8080899.
13. V. R. Paragarino, I. F. Silveira, M. Llamas-Nistal, “Open educational resources: A brief vision from IEEE topics,” in 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2076-2081, 2018. doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363495.
14. J. Á. Ariza, “A proposal for teaching programming languages through open hardware tools,” in 2016 IEEE 8th International conference on engineering education (ICEED), 202-207, 2016. doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856072.
15. F. E. A. Batista, G. S. Junior, I. F. Oliveira, “Precariousness, flexibility, and labor relations in the Fashion Industry,” Research, Society and Development, 10(1), e11510110841-e11510110841, 2021.
16. Y. Xie, L. Ji, B. Zhang, G. Huang, “Evolution of the scientific literature on input–output analysis: A bibliometric analysis of 1990–2017,” Sustainability, 10(9), 3135, 2018. doi.org/10.3390/su10093135.
17. J. M. Levitt, M. Thelwall, “Long term productivity and collaboration in information science,” Scientometrics, 108(3), 1103-1117, 2016. doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2061-8.
18. S. A. Nadira, L. Shixiang, X. Chen, “SWOT Analysis of the Management and Operation of Secondary Education System in Dhaka City of Bangladesh,” International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 8(4), 80, 2020. doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20200804.11
19. N. R. Hussein, Z. S. M Saleem, D. H. Musa, N. Ibrahim, I. A. Naqid, “Impact of COVID-19 on the medical education: experience from Kurdistan region of Iraq,” Journal of Medical Education, 19(1), 1, 2020. doi.org/10.5812/jme.106889.
20. C. A. Okigbo, A. Seeam, S. P. Guness, X. Bellekens, G. Bekaroo, V. Ramsurrun, “Low cost air quality monitoring: comparing the energy consumption of an arduino against a raspberry Pi based system,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, 1-8, 2020.
21. E. Lemos, A. Ghoshal, A. Aspat, “Hardware Architecture and Implementation of an AI Pet Robot,” International Journal of Applied Sciences and Smart Technologies, 2(2), 21-46, 2020. doi.org/10.24071/ijasst.v2i2.2792.
22. Z. Mabni, N. Shamsudin, S. Aliman, R. A. Latif, “Factors Influencing Students’ Performance in the First Computer Programming Course Taught Using Blended Learning Approach,” Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(SI3), 181-186, 2020. doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v5iSI3.2559.
23. D. C?linoiu, R. Ionel, M. Lascu, A. Cioabl?, “Arduino and LabVIEW in educational remote monitoring applications,” in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 1-5, 2014. doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044027.
24. A. J. Penn, A. Baynes, “Exploring How Affinity toward Engineering Increases in Underserved Youth After Summer Physical Computing Workshop,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-5, 2019. doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028706.

Citations by Dimensions

Citations by PlumX

Google Scholar

Crossref Citations

1. Hanan Hassan Ali Adlan, Elsadig Ahmed Mohamed Babiker, "Efficient Pattern Recognition Resource Utilization Neural Network ", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 44–50, 2026. doi: 10.25046/aj110105
2. Robinson Lawrance, Nishith Kumar Reddy Gorla, "System-Level Test Case Design for Field Reliability Alignment in Complex Products", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 55–64, 2025. doi: 10.25046/aj100605
3. Amalia Rodriguez Espinoza de los Monteros, Maximo Giovani Tandazo Espinoza, Byron Ivan Punina Cordova, Ronald Eduardo Tandazo Vanegas, "IoT and Business Intelligence Based Model Design for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Distribution Monitoring", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 79–92, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090409
4. Giwa Abdulgafar Babatunde, Ewetumo Theophilus, Ojo Joseph. Sunday, Adedayo Kayode David, Owolabi Gbenga Ayodele, "Development of a GSM-RC Automated Device for Measuring Mobile Communication Signal Strength and Meteorological Parameters", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 149–164, 2024. doi: 10.25046/aj090115
5. Juhyeon Jeon, Dongho Lee, "Resonance Coil Design for a Novel Battery Cell Balancing with using Near-Field Coupling", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 70–76, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080508
6. Mohammadali Hayerikhiyavi, Aleksandar Dimitrovski, "Three-phase Continuously Variable Series Reactor – Realistic Modeling and Analysis", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 202–211, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080323
7. Orapin Channumsin, Jirapun Pimpol, Tattaya Pukkalanun, Worapong Tangsrirat, "Tunable Resistorless Phase Shifter Realization with a Single VDGA", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 136–143, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080315
8. Chaiyaporn Khemapatapan, Thammanoon Thepsena, "Forecasting the Weather behind Pa Sak Jolasid Dam using Quantum Machine Learning", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 54–62, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080307
9. Temsamani Khallouk Yassine, Achchab Said, Laouami Lamia, Faridi Mohammed, "Hybrid Discriminant Neural Networks for Performance Job Prediction", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 116–122, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080213
10. Pratya Mongkolwai, Pitchayanin Moonmuang, Worapong Tangsrirat, Taweepol Suesut, "Active Simulation of Grounded Parallel-Type Immittance Functions Employing VDBAs and All Grounded Passive Components", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 131–137, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080116
11. Mohamed Elghayyaty, Anas El Habti El Idrissi, Omar Mouhib, Azeddine Wahbi, Abdelkader Hadjoudja, "Design, Optimization and Simulation of a New Decoder for Reed Solomon and BCH Codes using the New Syndromes Block", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 38–43, 2023. doi: 10.25046/aj080105
12. Chen Zhao, Weisheng Kong, Federico Percacci, Patrik Gnos, "Field Oriented Control and Commutation Based on Sensorless Methods for High-Speed Electrical Motors of Unmanned Multicopters", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 58–69, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070607
13. Jayan Kant Duggal, Mohamed El-Sharkawy, "High Performance SqueezeNext: Real time deployment on Bluebox 2.0 by NXP", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 70–81, 2022. doi: 10.25046/aj070308
14. Sepideh Amirpour, Torbjörn Thiringer, Yasin Sharifi, Marco Majid Kabiri Samani, "Improving of Heat Spreading in a SiC Propulsion Inverter using Graphene Assembled Films", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 98–111, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060614
15. Hung-Ming Chi, Liang-Yu Chen, Tzu-Chien Hsiao, "Extraction of Psychological Symptoms and Instantaneous Respiratory Frequency as Indicators of Internet Addiction Using Rule-Based Machine Learning", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 203–212, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060522
16. Hsuan-Yu Kuo, Jau-Jr Lin, "Development of Miniaturized Monolithic Isolated Gate Driver", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 177–184, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060520
17. Ibnu Daqiqil Id, Masanobu Abe, Sunao Hara, "Acoustic Scene Classifier Based on Gaussian Mixture Model in the Concept Drift Situation", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 167–176, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060519
18. Evens Tebogo Moraba, Tranos Zuva, Chunling Du, Deon Marais, "Parametric Study for the Design of a Neutron Radiography Camera-Based Detector System", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 248–256, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060327
19. Md. Tarequl Islam, Mostofa Kamal Nasir, Md. Mahedi Hasan, Mohammad Gazi Golam Faruque, Md. Selim Hossain, Mir Mohammad Azad, "Blockchain-Based Decentralized Digital Self-Sovereign Identity Wallet for Secure Transaction", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 977–983, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0602112
20. Showkat Ahmad Dar, S Palanivel, "Performance Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) And VGG on Real Time Face Recognition System", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 956–964, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0602109
21. Bismark Tei Asare, Kester Quist-Aphetsi, Laurent Nana, "Node-Node Data Exchange in IoT Devices Using Twofish and DHE", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 622–628, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060271
22. Muhammad Haqeem bin Mohd Nasir, Wan Siti Halimatul Munirah binti Wan Ahmad, Nurul Asyikin binti Mohamed Radzi, Fairuz Abdullah, "Performance Evaluation Reprogrammable Hybrid Fiber-Wireless Router Testbed for Educational Module", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1199–1207, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601136
23. Essamudin Ali Ebrahim, Nourhan Ahmed Maged, Naser Abdel-Rahim, Fahmy Bendary, "Open Energy Distribution System-Based on Photo-voltaic with Interconnected- Modified DC-Nanogrids", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 982–988, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj0601108
24. Hakimjon Zaynidinov, Sayfiddin Bahromov, Bunyodbek Azimov, Muslimjon Kuchkarov, "Lacol Interpolation Bicubic Spline Method in Digital Processing of Geophysical Signals", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 487–492, 2021. doi: 10.25046/aj060153
25. Kishan Bhushan Sahay, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Rakesh Maurya, "Standalone Operation of Modified Seven-Level Packed U-Cell Inverter for Solar Photovoltaic System", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 959–966, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj0506114
26. Sheetal Jagdale, Milind Shah, "Extending the Classifier Algorithms in Machine Learning to Improve the Performance in Spoken Language Understanding Systems Under Deficient Training Data", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 464–471, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050655
27. Amr Saleh, Nada Sayed, Ghada Ahmed Abdel, Mona Nagieb Eskander, "Fault-Tolerant Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive under Open-Phase Fault", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 455–463, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050654
28. Gyeongyong Heo, "Arduino-Compatible Modular Kit Design and Implementation for Programming Education", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 295–301, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050537
29. Beza Negash Getu, Mohamed Abdulkadir, Michael Tous, "Remote Control of Garden Plantation Water Pumps using Arduino and GSM Mobile", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 499–504, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050459
30. Neptali Montañez, Jomari Joseph Barrera, "Automated Abaca Fiber Grade Classification Using Convolution Neural Network (CNN)", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 207–213, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050327
31. Vuong Dang Quoc, Quang Nguyen Duc, "A Perturbation Finite Element Approach for Correcting Inaccuracies on Thin Shell Models with the Magnetic Field Formulation", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 166–170, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050322
32. Oleg Dvornikov, Vladimir Tchekhovski, Yaroslav Galkin, Alexei Kunz, Nikolay Prokopenko, "Experimental Studies of the Silicon Photomultiplier Readout Electronics Based on the Array Chip МН2ХА030", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 108–114, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050314
33. Ba Thanh Nguyen, Hong-Xuyen Thi Ho, "Design, Implementation and Performance Analysis of a Dual Axis Solar Tracking System", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 41–45, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050306
34. Rabeb Faleh, Souhir Bedoui, Abdennaceur Kachouri, "Review on Smart Electronic Nose Coupled with Artificial Intelligence for Air Quality Monitoring", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 739–747, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050292
35. Charles Buabeng-Andoh, Charles Baah, "Determinants of Students’ Actual use of the Learning Management System (LMS): An Empirical Analysis of a Research Model", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 614–620, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050277
36. Cheng Chuko, Fang-Lin Chao, Hsin-Yu Tsai, "Design of Interactive Aids for Children’s Teeth Cleaning Habits", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 494–499, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050263
37. Dora Yvonne Arce Santillan, Omar Freddy Chamorro Atalaya, Yesica Pamela Leandro Chacón, Jorge Isaac Castro Bedriñana, Elizabeth Rosario Martínez Santillán, "The Proportionality of Women Graduated from the Professional Career of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering at UNTELS: Analysis of their Academic Performance and Labor Field of Action", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 368–372, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050147
38. Vladyslav Kucher, Jens Hunloh, Sergei Gorlatch, "Performance Portability and Unified Profiling for Finite Element Methods on Parallel Systems", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 119–127, 2020. doi: 10.25046/aj050116
39. Noor A.Hussein, Mohamed Ibrahim Shujaa, "Smart Ambulance: Speed Clearance in the Internet of Things paradigm using Voice Chat", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 280–284, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040635
40. Youssef Bikrat, Khalid Salmi, Kamal Azghiou, Ahmad Benlghazi, Abdelhamid Benali, and Driss Moussaid, "Intelligent Wireless System for PV Supervision Based on The Raspberry Pi", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 94–98, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040611
41. Evan Hurwitz, Chigozie Orji, "Multi Biometric Thermal Face Recognition Using FWT and LDA Feature Extraction Methods with RBM DBN and FFNN Classifier Algorithms", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 67–90, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040609
42. Rahardhita Widyatra Sudibyo, Nobuo Funabiki, Minoru Kuribayashi, Kwenga Ismael Munene, Md. Manowarul Islam, Wen-Chung Kao, "A Proposal of TCP Fairness Control Method for Two-Host Concurrent Communications in Elastic WLAN System Using Raspberry Pi Access-Point", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 10–18, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040602
43. Olena Basalkevych, Olexandr Basalkevych, "Fuzzy Simulation of Historical Associative Thesaurus", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 224–233, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040528
44. Mohamad Faiz Ahmad, Syed Sahal Nazli Alhady, Ooi Zhu Oon, Wan Amir Fuad Wajdi Othman, Aeizaal Azman Abdul Wahab, Ahmad Afiq Muhammad Zahir, "Embedded Artificial Neural Network FPGA Controlled Cart", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 509–516, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040461
45. Panya Hantula, Rangsan Tongta, "A Balanced RF Power Amplifier using the Improvement 3-dB Quadrature Hybrid Couplers for Mitigation of the Reverse Intermodulation in FM Broadcasting Systems", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 421–430, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040451
46. Nindhia Hutagaol, Suharjito, "Predictive Modelling of Student Dropout Using Ensemble Classifier Method in Higher Education", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 206–211, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040425
47. Darya Denisenko, Nikolay Prokopenko, Nikolay Butyrlagin, "All-Pass RC-Filters Architecture with Independent Adjustment of the Main Parameters Based on Differential Difference Amplifiers", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 65–72, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040409
48. Dang Quoc Vuong, Nguyen Duc Quang, "Coupling of Local and Global Quantities by A Subproblem Finite Element Method – Application to Thin Region Models", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 40–44, 2019. doi: 10.25046/aj040206
49. Sherif Said, Samer AlKork, Taha Beyrouthy, Murtaza Hassan, OE Abdellatif, M Fayek Abdraboo, "Real Time Eye Tracking and Detection- A Driving Assistance System", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 446–454, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030653
50. Ivaylo Penev, Milena Karova, Mariana Todorova, Danislav Zhelyazkov, "Robot Self-Detection System", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 391–402, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030647
51. Nam Yoon Kim, Jinsung Cho, and Chang-Woo Kim, "An Improved Cross-Connection Abatement Algorithm with RSSI Using In-Band Magnetic Field Control in Densely Located LC Wireless Charger Environments", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 247–251, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030632
52. João Manuel Leitão Pires Caldeira, Vasco Nuno da Gama de Jesus Soares, Pedro Miguel de Figueiredo Dinis Oliveira Gaspar, Joel José Puga Coelho Rodrigues, Ricardo Manuel Valentim Fontes, José Luís Lopes Silva, "iSensA – A System for Collecting and Integrating Sensor Data", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 213–221, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030628
53. Tareq Khan, "A Wi-Fi based Architecture of a Smart Home Controlled by Smartphone and Wall Display IoT Device", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 180–184, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030623
54. Kabita Luitel, Dil Bahadur Gurung, Kedar Nath Uprety, "Effect of Various Parameters for Temperature Distribution in Human Body: An Analytic Approach", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 421–426, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030548
55. Esmail Mohamed Mohamed Abuhdima, Robert Prewitt Penno, "A Model of EM Fields from Static Data for Moving Conducting Cylinder", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 307–310, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030536
56. Yasushi Itoh, "A Dual-Band 90-Degree SiGe HBT Active Phase Shifter Based on Band-Pass and Band-Stop Designs Using Dual-Band Resonators", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 224–229, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030421
57. Sofiya Ali Mekonnen, Sibel Yenikaya, Gökhan Yenikaya, Güneş Yilmaz, "Effects of Dielectric Properties of the Material located inside Multimode Applicator on Microwave Efficiency", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 61–66, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030309
58. Cheryl Marie Cordeiro, "Which User of technology? Perspectivising the UTAUT model by application of the SFL language Pronoun System towards a systems perspective of technology acceptance and use", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 309–318, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030234
59. Rasel Ahmmed, Md. Asadur Rahman, Md. Foisal Hossain, "An Advanced Algorithm Combining SVM and ANN Classifiers to Categorize Tumor with Position from Brain MRI Images", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 40–48, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030205
60. Veit Bayer, Stephanie Kunath, Roland Niemeier, Jurgen Horwege, "Signal-Based Metamodels for Predictive Reliability Analysis and Virtual Testing", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 342–347, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030141
61. Hiroaki Anada, Seiko Arita, "Short CCA-Secure Attribute-Based Encryption", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 261–273, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030132
62. Marwa Farouk Ibrahim Ibrahim, Adel Ali Al-Jumaily, "Auto-Encoder based Deep Learning for Surface Electromyography Signal Processing", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 94–102, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030111
63. Ibrahim Alagoz, Thomas Hoiss, Reinhard German, "Improving System Reliability Assessment of Safety-Critical Systems using Machine Learning Optimization Techniques", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 49–65, 2018. doi: 10.25046/aj030107
64. Oleksandr Poliarus, Yevhen Poliakov, Andrii Lebedynskyi, Viktor Ivanov, Ruslan Pashchenko, "Measurement of the Bridge Surface Deflections Using Near-Field Amplitude of Secondary Radiators System", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 217–224, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020626
65. Hiroo Wakaumi, "A Switched-Capacitor Low-Pass Filter with Dynamic Switching Bias OP Amplifiers", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 100–106, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020613
66. Dmytro Pavlovich Kucherov, Andrei Nikolayevich Kozub, Oleg Nikolayevich Kostyna, "Group of UAVs Moving on Smooth Control Law with Fixed Obstacles", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1034–1041, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj0203131
67. João Ricardo de Castilho Louzada, Leonardo Breseghello Zoccal, Robson Luiz Moreno, Tales Cleber Pimenta, "A High Efficiency 0.13μm CMOS Full Wave Active Rectifier with Comparators for Implanted Medical Devices", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1019–1025, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj0203129
68. Hossein Bashashati, Rabab Kreidieh Ward, "Ensemble of Neural Network Conditional Random Fields for Self-Paced Brain Computer Interfaces", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 996–1005, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj0203126
69. Marwa Farouk Ibrahim Ibrahim, Adel Ali Al-Jumaily, "Self-Organizing Map based Feature Learning in Bio-Signal Processing", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 505–512, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020365
70. Kassem Jomaa, Fabien Ndagijimana, Hussam Ayad, Majida Fadlallah, Jalal Jomaah, "RFID Antenna Near-field Characterization Using a New 3D Magnetic Field Probe", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 492–497, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020363
71. Yasushi Itoh, Hiroaki Takagi, "L-Band SiGe HBT Active Differential Equalizers with Variable, Positive or Negative Gain Slopes Using Dual-Resonant RLC Circuits", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 362–368, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020346
72. Abdelhakim Chillali, "Matrix Encryption Scheme", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 56–58, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020408
73. Abdel Mehsen Ahmad, Zouhair Bazzal, Hiba Al Youssef, "Kinect-Based Moving Human Tracking System with Obstacle Avoidance", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 191–197, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020325
74. V.Ragunatha Nadarajah, Manmeet Mahinderjit Singh, "Privacy-by-Design (PbD) IoT Framework : A Case of Location Privacy Mitigation Strategies for Near Field Communication (NFC) Tag Sensor", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 134–148, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020116
75. Logeeshan Velmanickam, Dharmakeerthi Nawarathna, "Design and Fabrication of a Dielectrophoretic Cell Trap Array", Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 84–89, 2017. doi: 10.25046/aj020110