The Importance of Sustainability Audit Report in Go Public Companies Sector, in Indonesia

The Importance of Sustainability Audit Report in Go Public Companies Sector, in Indonesia

Volume 5, Issue 4, Page No 217-222, 2020

Author’s Name: Bambang Leo Handokoa), Ang Swat Lin Lindawati

View Affiliations

Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Communication, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia

a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bambang.handoko@binus.edu

Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 5(4), 217-222 (2020); a  DOI: 10.25046/aj050427

Keywords: Sustainability, Reporting, Audit, Indonesia, Corporation

Share
394 Downloads

Export Citations

Sustainability is considered new for Indonesian state-owned enterprises, also has become an obligation since two years ago. More and more people are aware of the environment for the next generation, the survival of mankind in the future. Sustainability issues are no exception in Indonesia. Companies publish sustainability reports as well as financial and annual reports. This sustainability report creates a need, namely the need for audits for sustainability reports. This is often referred to as a sustainability audit or assurance report. It is a qualitative descriptive survey. Researchers collect data from the literature and study observations as well as from interviews with stakeholders. The results of our study were obtained because the increasing number of public companies reporting on sustainability requires sustainability reporting audits in Indonesian public companies. The advantage of a sustainability audit report is that, in addition to its reputation or image, it can also add value to the company’s planning, structure and accountability. Brand name of the listed company. However, there are weaknesses, the weakness lies in comparability and costs.

Received: 09 April 2020, Accepted: 07 July 2020, Published Online: 22 July 2020

  1. World Commission on Environment and Development, “Brundtland Report – Our common future,” Our Common Futur., 2017.
  2. A. Masiulevičius and V. Lakis, “Differentiation of performance materiality in audit based on business needs,” Entrep. Sustain. Issues, 2018.
  3. GRI, “Consolidated Set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards,” 2018.
  4. H. Alhaddi, “Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability: A Literature Review,” Bus. Manag. Stud., 2015.
  5. E. Symeonaki, M. Papoutsidakis, D. Tseles, and M. Sigala, “Post-Implementation Evaluation of a University Management Information System (UMIS),” in Third International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sciences and in Industry (MCSI), 14–19, 2016.
  6. F. Aliakbari Nouri, M. Shafiei Nikabadi, and L. Olfat, “Developing the framework of sustainable service supply chain balanced scorecard (SSSC BSC),” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., 2019.
  7. Krismiaji, Y. Anni Aryani, and D. Suhardjanto, “International Financial Reporting Standards, board governance, and accounting quality A preliminary Indonesian evidence,” Asian Rev. Account., 2016.
  8. J. Elkington, “Enter the triple bottom line,” in The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up, 2013.
  9. R. G. Eccles, I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim, “The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance,” Manage. Sci., 2014.
  10. T. Rusmanto and C. Williams, “Compliance Evaluation on CSR Activities Disclosure in Indonesian Publicly Listed Companies,” Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., 2015.
  11. D. Dienes, R. Sassen, and J. Fischer, “What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review,” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2016.
  12. I. Ioannou and G. Serafeim, “Corporate Sustainability: A Strategy?,” SSRN Electron. J., 2019.
  13. E. Goicoechea, F. Gómez-Bezares, and J. V. Ugarte, “Integrated reporting assurance: Perceptions of auditors and users in Spain,” Sustain., 2019.
  14. W. Ahmad, A. V. Mishra, and K. J. Daly, “Financial connectedness of BRICS and global sovereign bond markets,” Emerg. Mark. Rev., 2018.
  15. J. Hammer and G. Pivo, “The Triple Bottom Line and Sustainable Economic Development Theory and Practice,” Econ. Dev. Q., 2017.
  16. H. Al-Shaer and M. Zaman, “Credibility of sustainability reports: The contribution of audit committees,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., 2018.
  17. S. A. Sarkodie and V. Strezov, “Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries,” Sci. Total Environ., 2019.
  18. P. S. Kurniawan, “Profesi Certified Sustainability Reporting Specialist, Pelaporan Keberlanjutan, Dan Teori Enterprise (Suatu Tinjauan Mengenai Profesi CSRS dalam Pelaporan Keberlanjutan),” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Hum., 2017.
  19. Ernst & Young and Boston College Centre, “Value of sustainability reporting – A study by EY and Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship,” EYGM Ltd., 2014.
  20. S. Withers and P. Demediuk, “Sustainability Reporting Guidelines,” Int. J. Sustain. Econ. Soc. Cult. Context, 2014.
  21. M. C. Wang, “The relationship between firm characteristics and the disclosure of sustainability reporting,” Sustain., 2017.

Citations by Dimensions

Citations by PlumX

Google Scholar

Scopus

Special Issues

Special Issue on Computing, Engineering and Multidisciplinary Sciences
Guest Editors: Prof. Wang Xiu Ying
Deadline: 30 April 2025

Special Issue on AI-empowered Smart Grid Technologies and EVs
Guest Editors: Dr. Aparna Kumari, Mr. Riaz Khan
Deadline: 30 November 2024

Special Issue on Innovation in Computing, Engineering Science & Technology
Guest Editors: Prof. Wang Xiu Ying
Deadline: 15 October 2024