Spatial Sampling Requirements for Received Signal Level Measurements in Cellular Networks of Suburban Area

Spatial Sampling Requirements for Received Signal Level Measurements in Cellular Networks of Suburban Area

Volume 2, Issue 1, Page No 277-287, 2017

Author’s Name: Abdlmagid Baserea), Ivica Kostanic

View Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA

a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: abasere2011@my.fit.edu

Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 2(1), 277-287 (2017); a DOI: 10.25046/aj020134

Keywords: Coverage area estimation, Received signal level, Coverage verification in cellular systems

Share

149 Downloads

Problem Downloading File? Alternate Link

Export Citations

A process for the determination of a required spatial resolution in the collection of the Received Signal Level (RSL) is discussed. This method considers RSL measurements as a three dimensional surface that is sampled through the data collection process. In addition, it is difficult to collect RSL measurements for an entire coverage area because of many obstacles, for example, buildings, lakes, and vegetation. Thus, the estimation of the coverage area is necessary for locations for which it is hard to collect the RSL. Kriging is a well-known technique for estimation of unknown values at specific locations, and it has shown very good results. The distance factor in Kriging has never been studied before for a coverage area. A drive test is used to collect RSL measurements, and they are gathered in different distance sizes, a procedure is known as binning, to form the coverage area. Kriging is used to estimate the entire RSL surface in bin sizes that are 200×200, 100×100, 50×50, and 25×25 meters of resolution. Using a 2-D Fourier analysis, the cutoff frequency for the Fourier transform of the RSL surface is determined. The spatial sampling resolution and the cutoff frequency are linked through a Nyquist sampling criterion. The approach was experimentally verified in a typical suburban environment. The results show that the spatial resolution requirement is between 50 and 100m.

Received: 30 December 2016, Accepted: 23 January 2017, Published Online: 28 January 2017

  1. Basere and I. Kostanic, “Cell Coverage Area Estimation From Receive Signal Level (RSL) Measurements,” World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (WCECS), 2016, in press.
  2. Basere and I. Kostanic, “Spatial Sampling Requirements for Received Signal Level Measurements in Cellular Networks,” IEEE Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), 2017, in press.
  3. Jiang and C. H. Davis, “Cell-coverage estimation based on duration outage criterion for CDMA cellular systems,” IEEE transactions on vehicular technology, vol. 52, pp. 814-822, 2003.
  4. D. Parsons and P. J. D. Parsons, “The mobile radio propagation channel,” 2000.
  5. M. Redl, “An Introduction to GSM,” Atech House Publishers, 1995.
  6. Holma and A. Toskala, WCDMA for UMTS, 3rd Ed., Wiley 2004.
  7. Dahlman and S. Parkvall, 4G: LTE.LTE-Advanced for Mobile Broadband, Accademic Press, 2011.
  8. C. Y. Lee and Y. S. Yeh, Ón the Estimation of the Second-Order Statistics of Log-Normal Fading in Mobile Radio Environment,” IEEE Transaction on Communication, Com-22, June 1974, pp. 869-873.
  9. Kostanic, J. Zec and N. Faour, “Sampling Criteria for Wideband Received Signal Measurements,” in proc. of International Conference in Wireless Networks, Las Vegas, NV, June 2003, pp. 24-29.
  10. K. Sharma and R. Singh, “Cell coverage area and link budget calculations in GSM system,” International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) vol, vol. 2, pp. 170-176, 2012.
  11. Sun, “Radio Network Planning for 2G and 3G,” Master of Science in Communications Engineering, Munich University of Technology, 2004.
  12. R. Manoj, “Coverage estimation for mobile cellular networks from signal strength measurements,” Citeseer, 1999.
  13. -S. Sheu and W.-H. Sheen, “Characteristics and modelling of inter-cell interference for orthogonal frequency-division multiple access systems in multipath Rayleigh fading channels,” IET Communications, vol. 6, pp. 3015-3025, 2012.
  14. Arigela, P. Veerendra, S. Anvesh, and K. Satya, “Mobile Phone Tracking & Positioning Techniques,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, 2013.
  15. Akbari, O. Onireti, M. A. Imran, A. Imran, and R. Tafazolli, “Effect of inaccurate position estimation on self-organising coverage estimation in cellular networks,” in European Wireless 2014; 20th European Wireless Conference; Proceedings of, 2014, pp. 1-5.
  16. Argany, M. A. Mostafavi, F. Karimipour, and C. Gagné, “A GIS based wireless sensor network coverage estimation and optimization: A Voronoi approach,” in Transactions on Computational Science XIV, ed: Springer, 2011, pp. 151-172.
  17. Sharma and R. Uppal, “RF Coverage Estimation of Cellular Mobile System,” Intrnational journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, p. 60, 2011.
  18. Sayrac, J. Riihijärvi, P. Mähönen, S. Ben Jemaa, E. Moulines, and S. Grimoud, “Improving coverage estimation for cellular networks with spatial bayesian prediction based on measurements,” in Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Cellular networks: operations, challenges, and future design, 2012, pp. 43-48.
  19. Kostanic, N. Rudic, and M. Austin, “Measurement sampling criteria for optimization of the Lee’s macroscopic propagation model,” in Vehicular Technology Conference, 1998. VTC 98. 48th IEEE, 1998, pp. 620-624.
  20. Hoeber, G. Wilson, S. Harding, R. Enguehard, and R. Devillers, “Visually representing geo-temporal differences,” in Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2010 IEEE Symposium on, 2010, pp. 229-230.
  21. Zimmerman, C. Pavlik, A. Ruggles, and M. P. Armstrong, “An experimental comparison of ordinary and universal kriging and inverse distance weighting,” Mathematical Geology, vol. 31, pp. 375-390, 1999.
  22. Li and A. D. Heap, “A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: Performance and impact factors,” Ecological Informatics, vol. 6, pp. 228-241, 2011.
  23. Konak, “Estimating path loss in wireless local area networks using ordinary kriging,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2010, pp. 2888-2896.
  24. A. Burrough, R. A. McDonnell, R. McDonnell, and C. D. Lloyd, Principles of geographical information systems: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  25. Kbiob, “A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand,” Journal of Chemical, Metallurgical, and Mining Society of South Africa, 1951.
  26. Wackernagel, Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  27. K. Leung and T. Law, “Kriging Analysis on Hong Kong Rainfall Data,” HKIE Transactions, vol. 9, pp. 26-31, 2002.
  28. Mijatovic and I. Kostanic, “Repeatability of Received Signal Level Measurements in GSM Cellular Networks”, in proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing, Feb 2007.