Abstract & Indexing

The Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal is indexed or abstracted by the following:

• SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) (Click Here) (Indexed till 2021)
• SCOPUS Indexing (Click Here) (Indexed till Feb-2021)
• CNKI Scholar (Click Here)
• Crossref DOI (Click Here)
• Researchgate (Click Here)
• Dimensions (Click Here)
• Genamics JournalSeek (Click Here)
• Google Scholar (Click Here) (Citations Link)
• WorldCat Discovery Services (Click Here)
• Publons (Click Here)
• Scilit (Click Here)
• Index Copernicus International (Click Here)

The CiteScore of ASTESJ is calculated as: 0.7 (Click Here for more information)

The SJR Score of ASTESJ is calculated as: 0.139 (Click Here for more information)

The SNIP Score of ASTESJ is calculated as: 0.298 (Click Here for more information)

Several journal metrics are calculated. The first metric is an alternative impact factor which is based on Google Scholar’s citation count.

The journal impact factor (JIF) normally referred to is the proprietary journal impact factor from Thomson Reuters calculated based on the Web of Science (WOS) and published in the Journal Citation Reports^® (JCR). We call this the JCR^®JIF. DOAJ writes: “There is only one official, universally recognized impact factor that is generated by Thomson Reuters; it is a proprietary measure run by a profit-making organization. It runs against the ethics and principles of open access.” This journal has no JCR^®JIF, but an alternative Google-based impact factor.

Today 80% of readers find their way to ASTESJ’s articles via Google Scholar. No open or proprietary database is directing so many readers to ASTESJ’s articles. Google Scholar is the only openly available database suitable for journal metric calculation. It has wide coverage and is a meaningful source. For this reason, ASTESJ is calculating its own Impact Factor based on Google Scholar’s citation counts. Scientists are used to Thomson Reuters’ way of calculating an impact factor. For this reason, ASTESJ applies Thomson Reuters'(TR) algorithm as published on http://wokinfo.com/essays/impact-factor in Figure 1. This algorithm is not protected and can be used by anyone. In short: ASTESJ calculates a 2-year Google-based Journal Impact Factor (2-GJIF).

With respect to all articles from this journal for the respective year:
A = total cites in 2023 = 135
B = number of articles published in 2020-21 = 339
2-GJIF for 2023 = C = A/B = 135/339 = 0.40 (TR algorithm, Google citations, data January 2024)

An impact factors for e.g. 2016-17 can only be published once this year is over (e.g. in 2018). At Thomson Reuters this is done when all 2016-17 publications have been processed. Once published, the JCR^®JIF for a given year is fixed. In contrast, a GJIF has never a fixed value. Depending on individual activities on the Internet (self-archiving and Green Open Access), some articles published Closed Access in one year may appear online only months or even years later. This has an influence on Google Scholar’s citation count and makes it necessary to state the 2-GJIF for a given year always with the date the data was retrieved from Google Scholar. ASTESJ may provide updates of the 2-GJIF during the year.

D = 2021 self-citations to articles published in 2019-21 = 20
Self-Cited Rate = D/A = 10/339 = 2.9 % (definition Rousseau 1999, data January 2024)

Journal self-citations are citations to articles in the same journal. A Self-Cited Rate below 20 % is considered acceptable. A higher Self-Cited Rate than this could be explained by a journal’s novel or highly specific topic, but could also reveal a journal with excessive self-citations.

Please interpret the 2-GJIF with caution:

• Due to differences in the underlying database, the value calculated here for the 2-GJIF cannot be compared with a JCR^®2-JIF.
• Do not compare journals from different subject fields based on their JIF. Journals in fundamental subject fields tend to have higher impact factors than journals in specialized or applied subject fields.
• Journal metrics should not be used to assess individual authors. Please refer instead to our article metrics provided for each paper: Number of citations from Google Scholar and a number of citations from CrossRef.